Cognitive Science
University Of California, San Diego

COGS 200: Probabilistic Functionalism

Spring 2005

Professor Gary Cottrell, CSE

Course Description

Probabilistic functionalism refers to attempts to model cognition as being in some sense probabilistically optimal. Some popular examples of probabilistic functionalism are models of early visual representations as minimizing redundancy (e.g. Bell & Sejnowski, 1997), models of perception as Bayesian inference (Knill & Richards, 1996), and models of hypothesis testing as maximizing expected information gain (Oaksford & Chater, 1994). While the scope of such models is quite broad, they share an appreciation that the tasks of intelligence are fundamentally noisy, ambiguous, yet statistically structured. Furthermore, the models are based on a common set of tools from probability and information theory.

The goal of this class is to bring together researchers to present and evaluate probabilistically optimal models of various levels of cognition. Is it true that probabilistic functionalism is a research paradigm "that may unify the cognitive sciences" (Movellan & Nelson, 2001)? Or are these models better suited for some domains than others, if the models are successful at all?

Course Information

  • Discussion Section: Fridays 2-2:50
  • Lecture: Fridays 3-4:30
  • Location: CSB 003
  • Instructor: Gary Cottrell
  • Discussion Board

    Discuss Probabilistic Functionalism

    Mailing list

    To receive emails about upcoming speakers & readings, you can subscribe to the COGS 200 mailing list by emailing:
    majordomo@cogsci.ucsd.edu

    and putting in the body of the message:

    subscribe cs200 ADDRESS
    end


    where ADDRESS is the email address that you want to have the cs200 mail sent to (e.g. johndoe@ucsd.edu).

    Assignments

    Paper Topics and Requirements

    Meeting Schedule & Readings

    DATE

    SPEAKER

    PAPERS

    SPEAKER SLIDES & RESOURCES

    4/1/05

    Javier Movellan & Virginia de Sa: Probability Tutorial and Introduction to Probabilistic Functionalism

    Edelman, S. & Vaina, L. A brief biography of David Marr in The International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences
    MacKay, D. (2003) Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms


    Movellan, J., Tanaka, F., Fortenberry, B., & Aisaka, K.The RUBI Project: Origins, Principles, and First Steps. Submitted to ICDL
    Probabilistic Functionalism: A Paradigm for the Scientific Study of Human Nature


    From campus: Chapter 2 of Manning, C. & Schutze, H. (1999) Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing
    also available in the Cognitive Science Building kitchen

    4/8/05

    Terry Sejnowski: Probabilistic models in neuroscience Hinton, G. & Sejnowski, T. (1999) Introduction. In Hinton, G. & Sejnowski, T. (eds.) Unsupervised Learning MIT Press pg: viii-xvi. Ghahramani, Z. Unsupervised Learning



    Jordan, M. & Sejnowski, T. (2001) Introduction. In Jordan, M. & Sejnowski, T. (eds.) Graphical Models: Foundations of Neural Computation MIT Press pg: xi-xxiv. Assignment of Multiplicative Mixtures in Natural Images

    4/15/05

    Bruno Olshausen: Intermediate level sensory coding
    Nakayama, K., He, Z., & Shimojo, S. (1995) Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher level vision. In Kosslyn, S. & Osherson, D. (eds.) Vision: An Invitation to Cognitive Science MIT Press pg: 1-70




    Optional: Olshausen, B. (2003) Principles of image representation in visual cortex. In Chalupa, L. & Werner, J. (eds.) The Visual Neurosciences MIT Press pg: 1603-1615




    Optional: Olshausen, B. & Field, D. (in press) How close are we to understanding V1? Neural Computation

    4/22/05

    Pamela Reinagle: Early sensory coding
    Rieke, Bodnar & Bialek (1995) Naturalistic stimuli increase the rate and efficiency of information transmission by primary auditory afferents. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. Dec 22; 262(1365):259-65.




    Dan, Atick, & Reid (1996) Efficient coding of natural scenes in the lateral geniculate nucleus: experimental test of a computational theory.




    Optional: Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. C. (1979) The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: a Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Vol. 205, No. 1161 pg: 581-598.




    Optional: Reinagel, P. & Reid, R. (2000) Temporal coding of visual information in the thalamus. J Neurosci. 20(14):5392-400.




    NEW: Barlow, H. (2001) Redundancy reduction revisited. Network: Computation in Neural Systems. 12:241-253.

    4/29/05

    Jonathan Nelson: Eye movements for concept learning
    Nelson, J. D. (in press). Finding useful questions: on Bayesian diagnosticity, probability, impact and information gain. Psychological Review. --pages 1-11 and 42-44 only--




    Nelson, J. D., Cottrell, G. W., & Movellan, J. R. (2004). Explaining eye movements during learning as an active sampling process. International Conference on Development and Learning.




    Optional: McKenzie, C. R. M. (2003). Rational models as theories-not standards-of behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(9), 403-406.




    Optional: Baron, J. (2004) Normative models of judgment and decision making. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making Chapter 2, pp. 19-36.




    Optional: Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. (2001). The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(8), 349-357.

    5/6/05

    Javier Movellan: Infomax approaches to behavior organization
    Movellan, J. (2003). Infomax control as a model of real time behvaior. INC Machine Perception Lab Technical Report

    5/13/05

    Emo Todorov: Optimality principles in sensorimotor control
    Scott, S. (2004). Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control. Nature Reviews Neuroscience




    Todorov, E. (2004). Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience 7(9) 907-915.

    5/20/05

    Pierre Baldi: Surprise and eye movements
    Itti, L. & Baldi, P. (2005). A principled approach to detecting surprising events in video. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).




    Baldi, P. (2004). Surprise: A Shortcut for Attention? In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. Tsotsos (Eds.) Neurobiology of Attention. Academic Press.

    5/27/05

    Craig McKenzie: Framing effects and information leakage
    Sher, S. & McKenzie, C.R.M. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames.

    6/3/05

    Jeff Elman: Probabalistic accounts of language comprehension
    Elman, J.L., Hare, M., & McRae, K. (2005). Cues, constraints, and competition in sentence processing. In M. Tomasello and D. Slobin (Eds.) Beyond Nature-Nurture: Essays in Honor of Elizabeth Bates. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.




    Hare, M., McRae, K., & Elman, J.L. (2002). Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 281-303.




    Optional: Hare, M., McRae, K., & Elman, J.L. (2004). Admitting the admitting verb sense into corpus analyses makes sense. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 181-224.

    Acknowledgement: Special thanks to Serge Belongie, who kindly provided me with the web site template for his highly successful CSE291 seminar, based upon the web site template kindly provided him by Charles Elkan, from his highly successful CSE 254 seminar!

    And special thanks to Patrick Gallagher for some of the pdfs.

    Most recently updated on April 23rd, 2005.